<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economics of Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/</link>
	<description>Art, life, art of life in Cambodia.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hem Sopheak</title>
		<link>http://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>Hem Sopheak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>please update me hot new...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please update me hot new&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>It looks as though EIC now asks browsers to pay for access to ALL reports from their website. This includes research paid for by other agencies/donors and is pretty cheeky to say the least. It also makes their results less transparent and therefore less reliable - we can't see anything about the methodology for their studies for example.
This makes me wonder about the tag 'non-profit'...
... on their site they only claim to be 'non-govermental' but that moniker covers Microsoft and Coco-Cola as well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks as though EIC now asks browsers to pay for access to ALL reports from their website. This includes research paid for by other agencies/donors and is pretty cheeky to say the least. It also makes their results less transparent and therefore less reliable - we can&#8217;t see anything about the methodology for their studies for example.<br />
This makes me wonder about the tag &#8216;non-profit&#8217;&#8230;<br />
&#8230; on their site they only claim to be &#8216;non-govermental&#8217; but that moniker covers Microsoft and Coco-Cola as well <img src='http://jinja.apsara.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
