https://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/ Art, life, art of life in Cambodia. Fri, 02 Mar 2018 03:28:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 https://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-1902 Bookmarks about Agriculture Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:29:30 +0000 http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing#comment-1902 [...] - bookmarked by 3 members originally found by littlemoon on 2008-10-25 The Economics of Publishing http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing - bookmarked by 4 members [...] [...] – bookmarked by 3 members originally found by littlemoon on 2008-10-25 The Economics of Publishing http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing – bookmarked by 4 members [...]

]]> https://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-1729 Hem Sopheak Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:00:17 +0000 http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing#comment-1729 please update me hot new... please update me hot new…

]]> https://jinja.apsara.org/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-1705 Ian Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:52:07 +0000 http://jinja.apsara.org/index.php/2008/09/the-economics-of-publishing#comment-1705 It looks as though EIC now asks browsers to pay for access to ALL reports from their website. This includes research paid for by other agencies/donors and is pretty cheeky to say the least. It also makes their results less transparent and therefore less reliable - we can't see anything about the methodology for their studies for example. This makes me wonder about the tag 'non-profit'... ... on their site they only claim to be 'non-govermental' but that moniker covers Microsoft and Coco-Cola as well :) It looks as though EIC now asks browsers to pay for access to ALL reports from their website. This includes research paid for by other agencies/donors and is pretty cheeky to say the least. It also makes their results less transparent and therefore less reliable – we can’t see anything about the methodology for their studies for example.
This makes me wonder about the tag ‘non-profit’…
… on their site they only claim to be ‘non-govermental’ but that moniker covers Microsoft and Coco-Cola as well

]]>